Logseq icon

Logseq

Open source privacy-first knowledge graph and note-taking with local storage

vs
Guru icon

Guru

AI enterprise knowledge management that surfaces the right information in the right workflow

Logseq
80%Strong
20/25
Guru
52%Moderate
13/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionLogseqGuru
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Logseq: Local-first by default — all data stored on user's device; optional sync service can be avoided entirely
Guru: Hosted on AWS US region; no EU or regional data residency options publicly available
5/5
2/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Logseq: Local application; no data transmitted to vendor by default; user has full legal control over their data
Guru: US Delaware corporation subject to CLOUD Act; GDPR DPA available; SCCs for EU data transfers
5/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Logseq: No vendor data retention at all in local mode; user controls all data lifecycle; no training possible
Guru: Customer knowledge content not used for model training; configurable retention and deletion; GDPR-compliant DPA
5/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Logseq: No vendor certifications — not applicable for a local-first open source tool
Guru: SOC 2 Type II certified; no ISO 27001 or additional certifications publicly confirmed
1/5
2/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Logseq: Excellent for individual use in regulated settings; limited enterprise controls reduce team deployment suitability
Guru: Verification and governance model well-suited to compliance knowledge management; limited data residency options
4/5
3/5
Total Score
20/25
13/25

Best For

Logseq iconLogseq

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Guru iconGuru

Best for regulated industries (ICO, BaFin); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Guru vs Logseq: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Guru (Guru Technologies, US) scores 13/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI enterprise knowledge management that surfaces the right information in the right workflow. Logseq (Logseq, US) scores 20/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open source privacy-first knowledge graph and note-taking with local storage.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Logseq leads with 5/5 vs 2/5.

Guru (2/5): Hosted on AWS US region; no EU or regional data residency options publicly available
Logseq (5/5): Local-first by default — all data stored on user's device; optional sync service can be avoided entirely

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Logseq leads with 5/5 vs 2/5.

Guru (2/5): US Delaware corporation subject to CLOUD Act; GDPR DPA available; SCCs for EU data transfers
Logseq (5/5): Local application; no data transmitted to vendor by default; user has full legal control over their data

#### Data Retention & Training

Logseq leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Guru (4/5): Customer knowledge content not used for model training; configurable retention and deletion; GDPR-compliant DPA
Logseq (5/5): No vendor data retention at all in local mode; user controls all data lifecycle; no training possible

#### Certifications

Guru leads with 2/5 vs 1/5.

Guru (2/5): SOC 2 Type II certified; no ISO 27001 or additional certifications publicly confirmed
Logseq (1/5): No vendor certifications — not applicable for a local-first open source tool

#### Regulatory Fit

Logseq leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Guru (3/5): Verification and governance model well-suited to compliance knowledge management; limited data residency options
Logseq (4/5): Excellent for individual use in regulated settings; limited enterprise controls reduce team deployment suitability

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationGuruLogseq
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo

Overall Verdict

Logseq has a clear trust advantage, scoring 20/25 compared to Guru's 13/25. Logseq particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention & training, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Logseq or Guru?

Logseq has a TrustKit score of 20/25 while Guru scores 13/25. Logseq currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Logseq and Guru compare on data residency?

Logseq scores 5/5 for data residency (Local-first by default — all data stored on user's device; optional sync service can be avoided entirely), while Guru scores 2/5 (Hosted on AWS US region; no EU or regional data residency options publicly available).

Are Logseq and Guru GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Logseq has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Guru scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool