CrewAI icon

CrewAI

Open-source framework for orchestrating multi-agent AI systems and autonomous teams

vs
LlamaIndex icon

LlamaIndex

Data framework for building LLM applications with your own data and knowledge

CrewAI
60%Moderate
15/25
LlamaIndex
64%Moderate
16/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionCrewAILlamaIndex
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
CrewAI: Self-hosted framework: maximum data sovereignty—deploy on any EU infrastructure. Cloud platform: US-hosted. Score reflects the self-hosted path which most serious EU deployments will use.
LlamaIndex: Open-source framework: deploy on any EU infrastructure—maximum data sovereignty. LlamaCloud: US-hosted, not recommended for EU sensitive data. Score reflects self-hosted framework path.
4/5
4/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
CrewAI: US-incorporated but Apache 2.0 open-source licence means self-hosted instances are not under vendor jurisdiction. Cloud platform falls under US jurisdiction. Self-hosted EU deployments achieve full EU legal control.
LlamaIndex: US-incorporated but MIT-licensed open-source framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to vendor jurisdiction. LlamaCloud falls under US jurisdiction.
3/5
3/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
CrewAI: Self-hosted: full control over all agent data, task outputs, and intermediate results. Cloud platform has standard SaaS data retention. Open-source path provides maximum data lifecycle control.
LlamaIndex: Self-hosted framework: full control over document data, embeddings, and query history. No data sent to LlamaIndex. LlamaCloud has standard SaaS retention. Self-hosted path is the appropriate choice for sensitive EU data.
4/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
CrewAI: No published independent security certifications for the company. Early-stage startup with self-attested security practices. For self-hosted enterprise deployments, your own security controls apply.
LlamaIndex: No published independent security certifications. Early-stage company building primarily on open-source distribution. Enterprise security is determined by your own deployment controls.
1/5
1/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
CrewAI: Self-hosted on EU infrastructure with EU-sovereign LLM providers achieves excellent regulatory fit. Cloud platform not recommended for EU regulated industries. Good choice for technical teams building multi-agent AI systems with sovereignty requirements.
LlamaIndex: Self-hosted on EU infrastructure enables excellent regulatory compliance. LlamaCloud not recommended for EU regulated industries. Strong choice for technical teams building RAG and knowledge base systems with sovereignty requirements.
3/5
3/5
Total Score
15/25
16/25

Best For

CrewAI iconCrewAI

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

LlamaIndex iconLlamaIndex

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

CrewAI vs LlamaIndex: Trust & Compliance Comparison

CrewAI (CrewAI, US) scores 15/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Open-source framework for orchestrating multi-agent AI systems and autonomous teams. LlamaIndex (LlamaIndex, US) scores 16/25 with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Data framework for building LLM applications with your own data and knowledge.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 4/5.

CrewAI (4/5): Self-hosted framework: maximum data sovereignty—deploy on any EU infrastructure. Cloud platform: US-hosted. Score reflects the self-hosted path which most serious EU deployments will use.
LlamaIndex (4/5): Open-source framework: deploy on any EU infrastructure—maximum data sovereignty. LlamaCloud: US-hosted, not recommended for EU sensitive data. Score reflects self-hosted framework path.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 3/5.

CrewAI (3/5): US-incorporated but Apache 2.0 open-source licence means self-hosted instances are not under vendor jurisdiction. Cloud platform falls under US jurisdiction. Self-hosted EU deployments achieve full EU legal control.
LlamaIndex (3/5): US-incorporated but MIT-licensed open-source framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to vendor jurisdiction. LlamaCloud falls under US jurisdiction.

#### Data Retention & Training

LlamaIndex leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

CrewAI (4/5): Self-hosted: full control over all agent data, task outputs, and intermediate results. Cloud platform has standard SaaS data retention. Open-source path provides maximum data lifecycle control.
LlamaIndex (5/5): Self-hosted framework: full control over document data, embeddings, and query history. No data sent to LlamaIndex. LlamaCloud has standard SaaS retention. Self-hosted path is the appropriate choice for sensitive EU data.

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 1/5.

CrewAI (1/5): No published independent security certifications for the company. Early-stage startup with self-attested security practices. For self-hosted enterprise deployments, your own security controls apply.
LlamaIndex (1/5): No published independent security certifications. Early-stage company building primarily on open-source distribution. Enterprise security is determined by your own deployment controls.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 3/5.

CrewAI (3/5): Self-hosted on EU infrastructure with EU-sovereign LLM providers achieves excellent regulatory fit. Cloud platform not recommended for EU regulated industries. Good choice for technical teams building multi-agent AI systems with sovereignty requirements.
LlamaIndex (3/5): Self-hosted on EU infrastructure enables excellent regulatory compliance. LlamaCloud not recommended for EU regulated industries. Strong choice for technical teams building RAG and knowledge base systems with sovereignty requirements.

Overall Verdict

CrewAI and LlamaIndex are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 15/25 and 16/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, CrewAI or LlamaIndex?

CrewAI has a TrustKit score of 15/25 while LlamaIndex scores 16/25. LlamaIndex currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do CrewAI and LlamaIndex compare on data residency?

CrewAI scores 4/5 for data residency (Self-hosted framework: maximum data sovereignty—deploy on any EU infrastructure. Cloud platform: US-hosted. Score reflects the self-hosted path which most serious EU deployments will use.), while LlamaIndex scores 4/5 (Open-source framework: deploy on any EU infrastructure—maximum data sovereignty. LlamaCloud: US-hosted, not recommended for EU sensitive data. Score reflects self-hosted framework path.).

Are CrewAI and LlamaIndex GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. CrewAI has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and LlamaIndex scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool