Rasa

Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants

LlamaIndex

Data framework for building LLM applications with your own data and knowledge

Rasa

Strong

19/25

LlamaIndex

Moderate

16/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionRasaLlamaIndex

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Rasa: Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

LlamaIndex: Open-source framework: deploy on any EU infrastructure—maximum data sovereignty. LlamaCloud: US-hosted, not recommended for EU sensitive data. Score reflects self-hosted framework path.

5/5

Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

4/5

Open-source framework: deploy on any EU infrastructure—maximum data sovereignty. LlamaCloud: US-hosted, not recommended for EU sensitive data. Score reflects self-hosted framework path.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Rasa: Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

LlamaIndex: US-incorporated but MIT-licensed open-source framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to vendor jurisdiction. LlamaCloud falls under US jurisdiction.

3/5

Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

3/5

US-incorporated but MIT-licensed open-source framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to vendor jurisdiction. LlamaCloud falls under US jurisdiction.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Rasa: Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

LlamaIndex: Self-hosted framework: full control over document data, embeddings, and query history. No data sent to LlamaIndex. LlamaCloud has standard SaaS retention. Self-hosted path is the appropriate choice for sensitive EU data.

5/5

Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

5/5

Self-hosted framework: full control over document data, embeddings, and query history. No data sent to LlamaIndex. LlamaCloud has standard SaaS retention. Self-hosted path is the appropriate choice for sensitive EU data.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Rasa: Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

LlamaIndex: No published independent security certifications. Early-stage company building primarily on open-source distribution. Enterprise security is determined by your own deployment controls.

2/5

Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

1/5

No published independent security certifications. Early-stage company building primarily on open-source distribution. Enterprise security is determined by your own deployment controls.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Rasa: Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

LlamaIndex: Self-hosted on EU infrastructure enables excellent regulatory compliance. LlamaCloud not recommended for EU regulated industries. Strong choice for technical teams building RAG and knowledge base systems with sovereignty requirements.

4/5

Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

3/5

Self-hosted on EU infrastructure enables excellent regulatory compliance. LlamaCloud not recommended for EU regulated industries. Strong choice for technical teams building RAG and knowledge base systems with sovereignty requirements.

Total Score

19/25

16/25

Best For

Rasa

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

LlamaIndex

Best for regulated industries (financial-services, healthcare); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

LlamaIndex vs Rasa: Trust & Compliance Comparison

LlamaIndex (LlamaIndex, US) scores 16/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Data framework for building LLM applications with your own data and knowledge. Rasa (Rasa, DE) scores 19/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source conversational AI framework for building enterprise chatbots and voice assistants.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Rasa leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●LlamaIndex (4/5): Open-source framework: deploy on any EU infrastructure—maximum data sovereignty. LlamaCloud: US-hosted, not recommended for EU sensitive data. Score reflects self-hosted framework path.

●Rasa (5/5): Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 3/5.

●LlamaIndex (3/5): US-incorporated but MIT-licensed open-source framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to vendor jurisdiction. LlamaCloud falls under US jurisdiction.

●Rasa (3/5): Dual incorporation: Rasa Technologies GmbH (Germany) and Rasa Technologies Inc (USA). German R&D but US entity introduces CLOUD Act considerations. Self-hosted deployments mitigate jurisdiction risks.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

●LlamaIndex (5/5): Self-hosted framework: full control over document data, embeddings, and query history. No data sent to LlamaIndex. LlamaCloud has standard SaaS retention. Self-hosted path is the appropriate choice for sensitive EU data.

●Rasa (5/5): Self-hosted architecture gives customers complete control over data retention. Rasa does not access or host customer data. Open-source code allows full audit of data handling.

#### Certifications

Rasa leads with 2/5 vs 1/5.

●LlamaIndex (1/5): No published independent security certifications. Early-stage company building primarily on open-source distribution. Enterprise security is determined by your own deployment controls.

●Rasa (2/5): Controls aligned with ISO 27002. Supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance. No formal ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certifications listed. Self-hosted model shifts certification burden to customer.

#### Regulatory Fit

Rasa leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

●LlamaIndex (3/5): Self-hosted on EU infrastructure enables excellent regulatory compliance. LlamaCloud not recommended for EU regulated industries. Strong choice for technical teams building RAG and knowledge base systems with sovereignty requirements.

●Rasa (4/5): Excellent for regulated industries due to self-hosting capability. Used by enterprises in financial services, healthcare, and government. Full data control enables compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

Overall Verdict

Rasa has a clear trust advantage, scoring 19/25 compared to LlamaIndex's 16/25. Rasa particularly excels in data residency, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Rasa or LlamaIndex?

Rasa has a TrustKit score of 19/25 while LlamaIndex scores 16/25. Rasa currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Rasa and LlamaIndex compare on data residency?

Rasa scores 5/5 for data residency (Open-source framework deployable on any infrastructure. Self-hosted option means data never leaves customer's environment. No cloud dependency for core functionality.), while LlamaIndex scores 4/5 (Open-source framework: deploy on any EU infrastructure—maximum data sovereignty. LlamaCloud: US-hosted, not recommended for EU sensitive data. Score reflects self-hosted framework path.).

Are Rasa and LlamaIndex GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Rasa has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and LlamaIndex scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool