Flowise icon

Flowise

Open-source low-code tool for building LLM applications and AI agents visually

vs
LlamaIndex icon

LlamaIndex

Data framework for building LLM applications with your own data and knowledge

Flowise
68%Strong
17/25
LlamaIndex
64%Moderate
16/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionFlowiseLlamaIndex
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Flowise: Self-hosted deployment provides maximum data sovereignty—data stays entirely within your own infrastructure. Score reflects self-hosted path. Cloud product is US-hosted (score 1).
LlamaIndex: Open-source framework: deploy on any EU infrastructure—maximum data sovereignty. LlamaCloud: US-hosted, not recommended for EU sensitive data. Score reflects self-hosted framework path.
5/5
4/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Flowise: US-incorporated company but open-source Apache 2.0 licence means self-hosted instances are independent of vendor jurisdiction. For self-hosted EU deployments, your infrastructure jurisdiction governs. Cloud product falls under US jurisdiction.
LlamaIndex: US-incorporated but MIT-licensed open-source framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to vendor jurisdiction. LlamaCloud falls under US jurisdiction.
3/5
3/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Flowise: Self-hosted: full control over all data lifecycle. No data leaves your infrastructure. Conversation history, documents, and embeddings are entirely under your management.
LlamaIndex: Self-hosted framework: full control over document data, embeddings, and query history. No data sent to LlamaIndex. LlamaCloud has standard SaaS retention. Self-hosted path is the appropriate choice for sensitive EU data.
5/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Flowise: Early-stage company with no published independent security certifications. Open-source self-hosted path means your own security controls apply. Cloud product has no published certifications.
LlamaIndex: No published independent security certifications. Early-stage company building primarily on open-source distribution. Enterprise security is determined by your own deployment controls.
1/5
1/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Flowise: Self-hosted on EU infrastructure with EU-sovereign LLM providers achieves excellent regulatory fit for EU organisations. Cloud product not recommended for regulated EU industries. Good choice for technical teams building sovereignty-first AI applications.
LlamaIndex: Self-hosted on EU infrastructure enables excellent regulatory compliance. LlamaCloud not recommended for EU regulated industries. Strong choice for technical teams building RAG and knowledge base systems with sovereignty requirements.
3/5
3/5
Total Score
17/25
16/25

Best For

Flowise iconFlowise

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

LlamaIndex iconLlamaIndex

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Flowise vs LlamaIndex: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Flowise (FlowiseAI, US) scores 17/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source low-code tool for building LLM applications and AI agents visually. LlamaIndex (LlamaIndex, US) scores 16/25 with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Data framework for building LLM applications with your own data and knowledge.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Flowise leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Flowise (5/5): Self-hosted deployment provides maximum data sovereignty—data stays entirely within your own infrastructure. Score reflects self-hosted path. Cloud product is US-hosted (score 1).
LlamaIndex (4/5): Open-source framework: deploy on any EU infrastructure—maximum data sovereignty. LlamaCloud: US-hosted, not recommended for EU sensitive data. Score reflects self-hosted framework path.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 3/5.

Flowise (3/5): US-incorporated company but open-source Apache 2.0 licence means self-hosted instances are independent of vendor jurisdiction. For self-hosted EU deployments, your infrastructure jurisdiction governs. Cloud product falls under US jurisdiction.
LlamaIndex (3/5): US-incorporated but MIT-licensed open-source framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to vendor jurisdiction. LlamaCloud falls under US jurisdiction.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

Flowise (5/5): Self-hosted: full control over all data lifecycle. No data leaves your infrastructure. Conversation history, documents, and embeddings are entirely under your management.
LlamaIndex (5/5): Self-hosted framework: full control over document data, embeddings, and query history. No data sent to LlamaIndex. LlamaCloud has standard SaaS retention. Self-hosted path is the appropriate choice for sensitive EU data.

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 1/5.

Flowise (1/5): Early-stage company with no published independent security certifications. Open-source self-hosted path means your own security controls apply. Cloud product has no published certifications.
LlamaIndex (1/5): No published independent security certifications. Early-stage company building primarily on open-source distribution. Enterprise security is determined by your own deployment controls.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 3/5.

Flowise (3/5): Self-hosted on EU infrastructure with EU-sovereign LLM providers achieves excellent regulatory fit for EU organisations. Cloud product not recommended for regulated EU industries. Good choice for technical teams building sovereignty-first AI applications.
LlamaIndex (3/5): Self-hosted on EU infrastructure enables excellent regulatory compliance. LlamaCloud not recommended for EU regulated industries. Strong choice for technical teams building RAG and knowledge base systems with sovereignty requirements.

Overall Verdict

Flowise and LlamaIndex are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 17/25 and 16/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Flowise or LlamaIndex?

Flowise has a TrustKit score of 17/25 while LlamaIndex scores 16/25. Flowise currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Flowise and LlamaIndex compare on data residency?

Flowise scores 5/5 for data residency (Self-hosted deployment provides maximum data sovereignty—data stays entirely within your own infrastructure. Score reflects self-hosted path. Cloud product is US-hosted (score 1).), while LlamaIndex scores 4/5 (Open-source framework: deploy on any EU infrastructure—maximum data sovereignty. LlamaCloud: US-hosted, not recommended for EU sensitive data. Score reflects self-hosted framework path.).

Are Flowise and LlamaIndex GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Flowise has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and LlamaIndex scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool