Dust

French AI platform for deploying AI assistants across your company's knowledge and tools

AutoGen (Microsoft)

Microsoft's open-source framework for building conversational multi-agent AI systems

Dust

Excellent

23/25

AutoGen (Microsoft)

Strong

18/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionDustAutoGen (Microsoft)

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Dust: Data hosted exclusively in EU (France). French SAS incorporation means EU law governs by default. Internal company data connected to Dust stays in EU infrastructure.

AutoGen (Microsoft): MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.

5/5

Data hosted exclusively in EU (France). French SAS incorporation means EU law governs by default. Internal company data connected to Dust stays in EU infrastructure.

5/5

MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Dust: French SAS under French and EU law. GDPR applies as corporate law. CNIL oversight. No US parent company, no CLOUD Act exposure. Founded by ex-OpenAI researchers building for EU sovereignty.

AutoGen (Microsoft): Published by Microsoft (US), but MIT licence means the framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to Microsoft's jurisdiction. Azure integration is optional and not required for the framework to function.

5/5

French SAS under French and EU law. GDPR applies as corporate law. CNIL oversight. No US parent company, no CLOUD Act exposure. Founded by ex-OpenAI researchers building for EU sovereignty.

3/5

Published by Microsoft (US), but MIT licence means the framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to Microsoft's jurisdiction. Azure integration is optional and not required for the framework to function.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Dust: Company data indexed by Dust is not used to train shared models. Data remains within the organisation's workspace. GDPR-compliant DPA available. Configurable data access controls per assistant.

AutoGen (Microsoft): Fully self-hosted: complete control over all agent conversation data, code execution outputs, and task results. No data sent to Microsoft unless Azure OpenAI is chosen as the LLM provider.

5/5

Company data indexed by Dust is not used to train shared models. Data remains within the organisation's workspace. GDPR-compliant DPA available. Configurable data access controls per assistant.

5/5

Fully self-hosted: complete control over all agent conversation data, code execution outputs, and task results. No data sent to Microsoft unless Azure OpenAI is chosen as the LLM provider.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Dust: ISO 27001 certification. As a fast-growing startup, the certification portfolio is expanding. SOC 2 Type II would further strengthen enterprise procurement credibility.

AutoGen (Microsoft): Open-source research framework with no published security certifications for the project itself. Enterprise deployments should apply their own security controls. The framework code has been reviewed by Microsoft Research.

3/5

ISO 27001 certification. As a fast-growing startup, the certification portfolio is expanding. SOC 2 Type II would further strengthen enterprise procurement credibility.

1/5

Open-source research framework with no published security certifications for the project itself. Enterprise deployments should apply their own security controls. The framework code has been reviewed by Microsoft Research.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Dust: Excellent regulatory fit for European enterprises building internal AI agent infrastructure. French incorporation, EU hosting, GDPR-native design, and support for EU-sovereign LLM providers (Mistral) make Dust a top choice for sovereignty-conscious EU organisations.

AutoGen (Microsoft): Excellent fit for technical EU teams building sovereign AI agent systems. MIT licence, any-LLM-provider support, and self-hosted deployment make this adaptable to any regulatory requirement. The framework imposes no data obligations; compliance is determined by your deployment choices.

5/5

Excellent regulatory fit for European enterprises building internal AI agent infrastructure. French incorporation, EU hosting, GDPR-native design, and support for EU-sovereign LLM providers (Mistral) make Dust a top choice for sovereignty-conscious EU organisations.

4/5

Excellent fit for technical EU teams building sovereign AI agent systems. MIT licence, any-LLM-provider support, and self-hosted deployment make this adaptable to any regulatory requirement. The framework imposes no data obligations; compliance is determined by your deployment choices.

Total Score

23/25

18/25

Best For

Dust

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

AutoGen (Microsoft)

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (CNIL, BaFin); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

AutoGen (Microsoft) vs Dust: Trust & Compliance Comparison

AutoGen (Microsoft) (Microsoft Research, US) scores 18/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Microsoft's open-source framework for building conversational multi-agent AI systems. Dust (Dust, FR) scores 23/25 with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. French AI platform for deploying AI assistants across your company's knowledge and tools.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (5/5): MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.

●Dust (5/5): Data hosted exclusively in EU (France). French SAS incorporation means EU law governs by default. Internal company data connected to Dust stays in EU infrastructure.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Dust leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (3/5): Published by Microsoft (US), but MIT licence means the framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to Microsoft's jurisdiction. Azure integration is optional and not required for the framework to function.

●Dust (5/5): French SAS under French and EU law. GDPR applies as corporate law. CNIL oversight. No US parent company, no CLOUD Act exposure. Founded by ex-OpenAI researchers building for EU sovereignty.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (5/5): Fully self-hosted: complete control over all agent conversation data, code execution outputs, and task results. No data sent to Microsoft unless Azure OpenAI is chosen as the LLM provider.

●Dust (5/5): Company data indexed by Dust is not used to train shared models. Data remains within the organisation's workspace. GDPR-compliant DPA available. Configurable data access controls per assistant.

#### Certifications

Dust leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (1/5): Open-source research framework with no published security certifications for the project itself. Enterprise deployments should apply their own security controls. The framework code has been reviewed by Microsoft Research.

●Dust (3/5): ISO 27001 certification. As a fast-growing startup, the certification portfolio is expanding. SOC 2 Type II would further strengthen enterprise procurement credibility.

#### Regulatory Fit

Dust leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (4/5): Excellent fit for technical EU teams building sovereign AI agent systems. MIT licence, any-LLM-provider support, and self-hosted deployment make this adaptable to any regulatory requirement. The framework imposes no data obligations; compliance is determined by your deployment choices.

●Dust (5/5): Excellent regulatory fit for European enterprises building internal AI agent infrastructure. French incorporation, EU hosting, GDPR-native design, and support for EU-sovereign LLM providers (Mistral) make Dust a top choice for sovereignty-conscious EU organisations.

Certifications at a Glance

Certification	AutoGen (Microsoft)	Dust
ISO 27001	No	Yes

Overall Verdict

Dust has a clear trust advantage, scoring 23/25 compared to AutoGen (Microsoft)'s 18/25. Dust particularly excels in legal jurisdiction, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Dust or AutoGen (Microsoft)?

Dust has a TrustKit score of 23/25 while AutoGen (Microsoft) scores 18/25. Dust currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Dust and AutoGen (Microsoft) compare on data residency?

Dust scores 5/5 for data residency (Data hosted exclusively in EU (France). French SAS incorporation means EU law governs by default. Internal company data connected to Dust stays in EU infrastructure.), while AutoGen (Microsoft) scores 5/5 (MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.).

Are Dust and AutoGen (Microsoft) GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Dust has a regulatory fit score of 5/5 and AutoGen (Microsoft) scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool