AutoGen (Microsoft)

Microsoft's open-source framework for building conversational multi-agent AI systems

Agenta

Open-source LLMOps platform for prompt management, evaluation, and observability — Berlin-based

AutoGen (Microsoft)

Strong

18/25

Agenta

Strong

20/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionAutoGen (Microsoft)Agenta

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

AutoGen (Microsoft): MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.

Agenta: Open-source with self-hosting: all LLM traces and evaluation data stay on your infrastructure. Cloud option hosted in EU.

5/5

MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.

5/5

Open-source with self-hosting: all LLM traces and evaluation data stay on your infrastructure. Cloud option hosted in EU.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

AutoGen (Microsoft): Published by Microsoft (US), but MIT licence means the framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to Microsoft's jurisdiction. Azure integration is optional and not required for the framework to function.

Agenta: German GmbH, fully under EU law. Berlin-based with European investors (Antler, InReach). No US parent.

3/5

Published by Microsoft (US), but MIT licence means the framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to Microsoft's jurisdiction. Azure integration is optional and not required for the framework to function.

5/5

German GmbH, fully under EU law. Berlin-based with European investors (Antler, InReach). No US parent.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

AutoGen (Microsoft): Fully self-hosted: complete control over all agent conversation data, code execution outputs, and task results. No data sent to Microsoft unless Azure OpenAI is chosen as the LLM provider.

Agenta: Self-hosted gives complete control. Open-source code is auditable. No data used for training.

5/5

Fully self-hosted: complete control over all agent conversation data, code execution outputs, and task results. No data sent to Microsoft unless Azure OpenAI is chosen as the LLM provider.

5/5

Self-hosted gives complete control. Open-source code is auditable. No data used for training.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

AutoGen (Microsoft): Open-source research framework with no published security certifications for the project itself. Enterprise deployments should apply their own security controls. The framework code has been reviewed by Microsoft Research.

Agenta: No formal certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001). Expected at this early stage. Self-hosted model allows organisations to apply their own security controls.

1/5

Open-source research framework with no published security certifications for the project itself. Enterprise deployments should apply their own security controls. The framework code has been reviewed by Microsoft Research.

1/5

No formal certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001). Expected at this early stage. Self-hosted model allows organisations to apply their own security controls.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

AutoGen (Microsoft): Excellent fit for technical EU teams building sovereign AI agent systems. MIT licence, any-LLM-provider support, and self-hosted deployment make this adaptable to any regulatory requirement. The framework imposes no data obligations; compliance is determined by your deployment choices.

Agenta: EU-native, open-source, self-hostable. Strong sovereignty posture offset by lack of formal certifications. Best suited for teams that manage their own infrastructure and security.

4/5

Excellent fit for technical EU teams building sovereign AI agent systems. MIT licence, any-LLM-provider support, and self-hosted deployment make this adaptable to any regulatory requirement. The framework imposes no data obligations; compliance is determined by your deployment choices.

4/5

EU-native, open-source, self-hostable. Strong sovereignty posture offset by lack of formal certifications. Best suited for teams that manage their own infrastructure and security.

Total Score

18/25

20/25

Best For

AutoGen (Microsoft)

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Agenta

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Agenta vs AutoGen (Microsoft): Trust & Compliance Comparison

Agenta (Agenta, DE) scores 20/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source LLMOps platform for prompt management, evaluation, and observability — Berlin-based. AutoGen (Microsoft) (Microsoft Research, US) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Microsoft's open-source framework for building conversational multi-agent AI systems.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

●Agenta (5/5): Open-source with self-hosting: all LLM traces and evaluation data stay on your infrastructure. Cloud option hosted in EU.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (5/5): MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Agenta leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

●Agenta (5/5): German GmbH, fully under EU law. Berlin-based with European investors (Antler, InReach). No US parent.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (3/5): Published by Microsoft (US), but MIT licence means the framework is infrastructure-independent. Self-hosted EU deployments are not subject to Microsoft's jurisdiction. Azure integration is optional and not required for the framework to function.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

●Agenta (5/5): Self-hosted gives complete control. Open-source code is auditable. No data used for training.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (5/5): Fully self-hosted: complete control over all agent conversation data, code execution outputs, and task results. No data sent to Microsoft unless Azure OpenAI is chosen as the LLM provider.

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 1/5.

●Agenta (1/5): No formal certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001). Expected at this early stage. Self-hosted model allows organisations to apply their own security controls.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (1/5): Open-source research framework with no published security certifications for the project itself. Enterprise deployments should apply their own security controls. The framework code has been reviewed by Microsoft Research.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 4/5.

●Agenta (4/5): EU-native, open-source, self-hostable. Strong sovereignty posture offset by lack of formal certifications. Best suited for teams that manage their own infrastructure and security.

●AutoGen (Microsoft) (4/5): Excellent fit for technical EU teams building sovereign AI agent systems. MIT licence, any-LLM-provider support, and self-hosted deployment make this adaptable to any regulatory requirement. The framework imposes no data obligations; compliance is determined by your deployment choices.

Overall Verdict

Agenta has a clear trust advantage, scoring 20/25 compared to AutoGen (Microsoft)'s 18/25. Agenta particularly excels in legal jurisdiction.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, AutoGen (Microsoft) or Agenta?

AutoGen (Microsoft) has a TrustKit score of 18/25 while Agenta scores 20/25. Agenta currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do AutoGen (Microsoft) and Agenta compare on data residency?

AutoGen (Microsoft) scores 5/5 for data residency (MIT-licensed open-source framework. No vendor cloud—deploy entirely on your own EU infrastructure. Data residency is determined entirely by your chosen infrastructure. Maximum possible data sovereignty.), while Agenta scores 5/5 (Open-source with self-hosting: all LLM traces and evaluation data stay on your infrastructure. Cloud option hosted in EU.).

Are AutoGen (Microsoft) and Agenta GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. AutoGen (Microsoft) has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Agenta scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool