Modal icon

Modal

Serverless GPU compute platform for AI model training, inference, and data pipelines

vs
LangSmith (LangChain) icon

LangSmith (LangChain)

LLM observability, testing, and deployment platform for production AI applications

Modal
36%Caution
9/25
LangSmith (LangChain)
52%Moderate
13/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionModalLangSmith (LangChain)
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Modal: US-only infrastructure. No EU data centre options. Not suitable for GDPR personal data processing without SCCs and TIA.
LangSmith (LangChain): Cloud product processes trace data (including prompts and LLM outputs) in US infrastructure. Self-hosted LangSmith Enterprise enables EU data residency. Open-source LangChain framework can run fully on-premise.
1/5
2/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Modal: Delaware incorporation, US jurisdiction, CLOUD Act applies. Basic GDPR privacy documentation. No EU subsidiary.
LangSmith (LangChain): California incorporation, US jurisdiction, CLOUD Act applies. SOC 2 Type II and GDPR DPA available. Self-hosted enterprise removes US cloud dependency for EU deployments.
2/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Modal: Customer compute workloads are isolated and not used for shared training. Workload outputs are customer-controlled. Data governance documentation is lighter than enterprise-focused providers.
LangSmith (LangChain): Trace data not used for LLM training. Configurable trace retention periods. Enterprise self-hosted gives full control over data lifecycle. Cloud product has clear data isolation per project.
3/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Modal: No published independent certifications. Developer-focused startup with self-attested security practices. Not yet suitable for regulated industry enterprise procurement.
LangSmith (LangChain): SOC 2 Type II certification. Appropriate for a developer tooling company. ISO 27001 would strengthen the posture for enterprise regulated-industry procurement.
1/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Modal: Suited to AI developers and startups building non-personal-data workloads. US jurisdiction and absence of certifications limit suitability for regulated EU industries. Good for R&D and prototyping contexts.
LangSmith (LangChain): Cloud product requires GDPR transfer mechanisms for EU personal data in traces. Self-hosted LangSmith Enterprise is the appropriate deployment for EU regulated industries. Open-source framework usage is unrestricted.
2/5
2/5
Total Score
9/25
13/25

Best For

Modal iconModal

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

LangSmith (LangChain) iconLangSmith (LangChain)

Best for teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

LangSmith (LangChain) vs Modal: Trust & Compliance Comparison

LangSmith (LangChain) (LangChain, US) scores 13/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. LLM observability, testing, and deployment platform for production AI applications. Modal (Modal Labs, US) scores 9/25 with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. Serverless GPU compute platform for AI model training, inference, and data pipelines.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

LangSmith (LangChain) leads with 2/5 vs 1/5.

LangSmith (LangChain) (2/5): Cloud product processes trace data (including prompts and LLM outputs) in US infrastructure. Self-hosted LangSmith Enterprise enables EU data residency. Open-source LangChain framework can run fully on-premise.
Modal (1/5): US-only infrastructure. No EU data centre options. Not suitable for GDPR personal data processing without SCCs and TIA.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 2/5.

LangSmith (LangChain) (2/5): California incorporation, US jurisdiction, CLOUD Act applies. SOC 2 Type II and GDPR DPA available. Self-hosted enterprise removes US cloud dependency for EU deployments.
Modal (2/5): Delaware incorporation, US jurisdiction, CLOUD Act applies. Basic GDPR privacy documentation. No EU subsidiary.

#### Data Retention & Training

LangSmith (LangChain) leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

LangSmith (LangChain) (4/5): Trace data not used for LLM training. Configurable trace retention periods. Enterprise self-hosted gives full control over data lifecycle. Cloud product has clear data isolation per project.
Modal (3/5): Customer compute workloads are isolated and not used for shared training. Workload outputs are customer-controlled. Data governance documentation is lighter than enterprise-focused providers.

#### Certifications

LangSmith (LangChain) leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

LangSmith (LangChain) (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certification. Appropriate for a developer tooling company. ISO 27001 would strengthen the posture for enterprise regulated-industry procurement.
Modal (1/5): No published independent certifications. Developer-focused startup with self-attested security practices. Not yet suitable for regulated industry enterprise procurement.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 2/5.

LangSmith (LangChain) (2/5): Cloud product requires GDPR transfer mechanisms for EU personal data in traces. Self-hosted LangSmith Enterprise is the appropriate deployment for EU regulated industries. Open-source framework usage is unrestricted.
Modal (2/5): Suited to AI developers and startups building non-personal-data workloads. US jurisdiction and absence of certifications limit suitability for regulated EU industries. Good for R&D and prototyping contexts.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationLangSmith (LangChain)Modal
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo

Overall Verdict

LangSmith (LangChain) has a clear trust advantage, scoring 13/25 compared to Modal's 9/25. LangSmith (LangChain) particularly excels in data residency, data retention & training, certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Modal or LangSmith (LangChain)?

Modal has a TrustKit score of 9/25 while LangSmith (LangChain) scores 13/25. LangSmith (LangChain) currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Modal and LangSmith (LangChain) compare on data residency?

Modal scores 1/5 for data residency (US-only infrastructure. No EU data centre options. Not suitable for GDPR personal data processing without SCCs and TIA.), while LangSmith (LangChain) scores 2/5 (Cloud product processes trace data (including prompts and LLM outputs) in US infrastructure. Self-hosted LangSmith Enterprise enables EU data residency. Open-source LangChain framework can run fully on-premise.).

Are Modal and LangSmith (LangChain) GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Modal has a regulatory fit score of 2/5 and LangSmith (LangChain) scores 2/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool