Together AI

Open-source LLM inference and fine-tuning platform for enterprise AI builders

Groq

Ultra-fast LPU inference for open-source LLMs at developer-friendly pricing

Together AI

Caution

10/25

Groq

Caution

10/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionTogether AIGroq

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Together AI: All inference and fine-tuning workloads processed in US data centres. No EU data residency option. GDPR transfer mechanisms (SCCs) required for European personal data processing.

Groq: All inference processed in US data centres. No EU data residency option available as of early 2026. European businesses processing personal data via the Groq API must implement GDPR transfer mechanisms.

1/5

All inference and fine-tuning workloads processed in US data centres. No EU data residency option. GDPR transfer mechanisms (SCCs) required for European personal data processing.

1/5

All inference processed in US data centres. No EU data residency option available as of early 2026. European businesses processing personal data via the Groq API must implement GDPR transfer mechanisms.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Together AI: Incorporated in Delaware, US. Subject to CLOUD Act. GDPR DPA available for enterprise customers contractually, but US jurisdiction governs. No EU subsidiary structure.

Groq: Groq Inc. incorporated in California, subject to US law including the CLOUD Act. GDPR-compliant DPA available contractually, but US legal jurisdiction is the governing framework. No EU parent company or subsidiary structure.

2/5

Incorporated in Delaware, US. Subject to CLOUD Act. GDPR DPA available for enterprise customers contractually, but US jurisdiction governs. No EU subsidiary structure.

2/5

Groq Inc. incorporated in California, subject to US law including the CLOUD Act. GDPR-compliant DPA available contractually, but US legal jurisdiction is the governing framework. No EU parent company or subsidiary structure.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Together AI: Clear policy that customer data and fine-tuning datasets are not used to train shared models. Fine-tuned model weights are customer property. Good baseline for data isolation, but residency limitation remains.

Groq: Groq's privacy policy states that inference request data is not used for model training. Minimal data retention for API calls. Suitable for non-personal-data inference use cases; personal data processing requires GDPR transfer mechanism.

4/5

Clear policy that customer data and fine-tuning datasets are not used to train shared models. Fine-tuned model weights are customer property. Good baseline for data isolation, but residency limitation remains.

4/5

Groq's privacy policy states that inference request data is not used for model training. Minimal data retention for API calls. Suitable for non-personal-data inference use cases; personal data processing requires GDPR transfer mechanism.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Together AI: No published ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, or independent security certifications as of early 2026. Security practices are self-attested. Significant gap for enterprise procurement in regulated industries.

Groq: No published ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, or other independent security certifications as of early 2026. Privacy and security practices are self-attested. This is a significant gap for enterprise procurement in regulated industries.

1/5

No published ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, or independent security certifications as of early 2026. Security practices are self-attested. Significant gap for enterprise procurement in regulated industries.

1/5

No published ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, or other independent security certifications as of early 2026. Privacy and security practices are self-attested. This is a significant gap for enterprise procurement in regulated industries.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Together AI: Not suitable for GDPR-regulated personal data processing without SCCs and TIA. Good for development, prototyping, and non-personal-data AI workloads. US jurisdiction and absence of certifications limit suitability for regulated EU industries.

Groq: Not suitable for GDPR-regulated personal data processing without appropriate SCCs and transfer impact assessment. Good option for non-personal-data use cases (e.g., inference on internal documents with no personal data). Not recommended for regulated EU industries without significant additional controls.

2/5

Not suitable for GDPR-regulated personal data processing without SCCs and TIA. Good for development, prototyping, and non-personal-data AI workloads. US jurisdiction and absence of certifications limit suitability for regulated EU industries.

2/5

Not suitable for GDPR-regulated personal data processing without appropriate SCCs and transfer impact assessment. Good option for non-personal-data use cases (e.g., inference on internal documents with no personal data). Not recommended for regulated EU industries without significant additional controls.

Total Score

10/25

Best For

Together AI

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Groq

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Groq vs Together AI: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Groq (Groq, US) scores 10/25 overall with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. Ultra-fast LPU inference for open-source LLMs at developer-friendly pricing. Together AI (Together AI, US) scores 10/25 with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. Open-source LLM inference and fine-tuning platform for enterprise AI builders.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 1/5.

●Groq (1/5): All inference processed in US data centres. No EU data residency option available as of early 2026. European businesses processing personal data via the Groq API must implement GDPR transfer mechanisms.

●Together AI (1/5): All inference and fine-tuning workloads processed in US data centres. No EU data residency option. GDPR transfer mechanisms (SCCs) required for European personal data processing.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 2/5.

●Groq (2/5): Groq Inc. incorporated in California, subject to US law including the CLOUD Act. GDPR-compliant DPA available contractually, but US legal jurisdiction is the governing framework. No EU parent company or subsidiary structure.

●Together AI (2/5): Incorporated in Delaware, US. Subject to CLOUD Act. GDPR DPA available for enterprise customers contractually, but US jurisdiction governs. No EU subsidiary structure.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

●Groq (4/5): Groq's privacy policy states that inference request data is not used for model training. Minimal data retention for API calls. Suitable for non-personal-data inference use cases; personal data processing requires GDPR transfer mechanism.

●Together AI (4/5): Clear policy that customer data and fine-tuning datasets are not used to train shared models. Fine-tuned model weights are customer property. Good baseline for data isolation, but residency limitation remains.

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 1/5.

●Groq (1/5): No published ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, or other independent security certifications as of early 2026. Privacy and security practices are self-attested. This is a significant gap for enterprise procurement in regulated industries.

●Together AI (1/5): No published ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, or independent security certifications as of early 2026. Security practices are self-attested. Significant gap for enterprise procurement in regulated industries.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 2/5.

●Groq (2/5): Not suitable for GDPR-regulated personal data processing without appropriate SCCs and transfer impact assessment. Good option for non-personal-data use cases (e.g., inference on internal documents with no personal data). Not recommended for regulated EU industries without significant additional controls.

●Together AI (2/5): Not suitable for GDPR-regulated personal data processing without SCCs and TIA. Good for development, prototyping, and non-personal-data AI workloads. US jurisdiction and absence of certifications limit suitability for regulated EU industries.

Overall Verdict

Groq and Together AI are closely matched on trust and compliance, with scores of 10/25 and 10/25 respectively. The right choice depends on your specific regulatory requirements and existing technology stack.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Together AI or Groq?

Together AI has a TrustKit score of 10/25 while Groq scores 10/25. Both tools are currently rated equally across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Together AI and Groq compare on data residency?

Together AI scores 1/5 for data residency (All inference and fine-tuning workloads processed in US data centres. No EU data residency option. GDPR transfer mechanisms (SCCs) required for European personal data processing.), while Groq scores 1/5 (All inference processed in US data centres. No EU data residency option available as of early 2026. European businesses processing personal data via the Groq API must implement GDPR transfer mechanisms.).

Are Together AI and Groq GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Together AI has a regulatory fit score of 2/5 and Groq scores 2/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool