Glean icon

Glean

Enterprise AI search that connects and searches all company knowledge with strict access controls

vs
Phind icon

Phind

AI search engine and coding assistant built for developers

Glean
64%Moderate
16/25
Phind
44%Caution
11/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionGleanPhind
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Glean: AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure
Phind: Data hosted on US cloud infrastructure. No EU or regional data residency options available.
3/5
2/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Glean: US Delaware corporation subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act; DPAs available for GDPR; Capital One Ventures as investor may raise considerations for some financial services organisations
Phind: US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act. No EU legal entity.
2/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Glean: Customer data not used to train foundational AI models; strict permission mirroring ensures data is only surfaced to authorised users; comprehensive audit logs and configurable retention policies
Phind: Users can opt out of data being used for model training. Search history can be deleted. Reasonable privacy controls for a developer tool.
4/5
3/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Glean: SOC 2 Type II certified; HIPAA BAA available; GDPR compliant with DPA; no ISO 27001 publicly confirmed
Phind: No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Early-stage startup without formal compliance programme.
3/5
2/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Glean: Permission-enforcement architecture, HIPAA BAA, audit logs, and data residency options make Glean well-suited to large regulated enterprises; US jurisdiction is the primary limitation for EU-sovereignty-focused buyers
Phind: Suitable for general developer use but lacks enterprise compliance features for regulated industries. No DPA or audit capabilities offered.
4/5
2/5
Total Score
16/25
11/25

Best For

Glean iconGlean

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Phind iconPhind

Best for teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Glean vs Phind: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Glean (Glean, US) scores 16/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Enterprise AI search that connects and searches all company knowledge with strict access controls. Phind (Phind, US) scores 11/25 with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. AI search engine and coding assistant built for developers.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Glean leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Glean (3/5): AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure
Phind (2/5): Data hosted on US cloud infrastructure. No EU or regional data residency options available.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 2/5.

Glean (2/5): US Delaware corporation subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act; DPAs available for GDPR; Capital One Ventures as investor may raise considerations for some financial services organisations
Phind (2/5): US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act. No EU legal entity.

#### Data Retention & Training

Glean leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Glean (4/5): Customer data not used to train foundational AI models; strict permission mirroring ensures data is only surfaced to authorised users; comprehensive audit logs and configurable retention policies
Phind (3/5): Users can opt out of data being used for model training. Search history can be deleted. Reasonable privacy controls for a developer tool.

#### Certifications

Glean leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Glean (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified; HIPAA BAA available; GDPR compliant with DPA; no ISO 27001 publicly confirmed
Phind (2/5): No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications publicly disclosed. Early-stage startup without formal compliance programme.

#### Regulatory Fit

Glean leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

Glean (4/5): Permission-enforcement architecture, HIPAA BAA, audit logs, and data residency options make Glean well-suited to large regulated enterprises; US jurisdiction is the primary limitation for EU-sovereignty-focused buyers
Phind (2/5): Suitable for general developer use but lacks enterprise compliance features for regulated industries. No DPA or audit capabilities offered.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationGleanPhind
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo

Overall Verdict

Glean has a clear trust advantage, scoring 16/25 compared to Phind's 11/25. Glean particularly excels in data residency, data retention & training, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Glean or Phind?

Glean has a TrustKit score of 16/25 while Phind scores 11/25. Glean currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Glean and Phind compare on data residency?

Glean scores 3/5 for data residency (AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure), while Phind scores 2/5 (Data hosted on US cloud infrastructure. No EU or regional data residency options available.).

Are Glean and Phind GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Glean has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Phind scores 2/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool