Glean icon

Glean

Enterprise AI search that connects and searches all company knowledge with strict access controls

vs
Kagi icon

Kagi

Privacy-first AI search engine with no ads and no tracking

Glean
64%Moderate
16/25
Kagi
44%Caution
11/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionGleanKagi
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Glean: AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure
Kagi: All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently available.
3/5
1/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Glean: US Delaware corporation subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act; DPAs available for GDPR; Capital One Ventures as investor may raise considerations for some financial services organisations
Kagi: US-incorporated and subject to CLOUD Act; strong privacy-by-design model but US legal jurisdiction is a residual risk.
2/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Glean: Customer data not used to train foundational AI models; strict permission mirroring ensures data is only surfaced to authorised users; comprehensive audit logs and configurable retention policies
Kagi: No training on user search data, no persistent user profiling, and no ad-based tracking by design.
4/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Glean: SOC 2 Type II certified; HIPAA BAA available; GDPR compliant with DPA; no ISO 27001 publicly confirmed
Kagi: No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other formal third-party security certifications are currently published.
3/5
1/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Glean: Permission-enforcement architecture, HIPAA BAA, audit logs, and data residency options make Glean well-suited to large regulated enterprises; US jurisdiction is the primary limitation for EU-sovereignty-focused buyers
Kagi: Privacy-first business model is commendable, but lack of certifications and US jurisdiction limit regulated institutional use in Europe.
4/5
2/5
Total Score
16/25
11/25

Best For

Glean iconGlean

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Kagi iconKagi

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Detailed Comparison

Glean vs Kagi: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Glean (Glean, US) scores 16/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Enterprise AI search that connects and searches all company knowledge with strict access controls. Kagi (Kagi, US) scores 11/25 with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. Privacy-first AI search engine with no ads and no tracking.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Glean leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

Glean (3/5): AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure
Kagi (1/5): All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently available.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 2/5.

Glean (2/5): US Delaware corporation subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act; DPAs available for GDPR; Capital One Ventures as investor may raise considerations for some financial services organisations
Kagi (2/5): US-incorporated and subject to CLOUD Act; strong privacy-by-design model but US legal jurisdiction is a residual risk.

#### Data Retention & Training

Kagi leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Glean (4/5): Customer data not used to train foundational AI models; strict permission mirroring ensures data is only surfaced to authorised users; comprehensive audit logs and configurable retention policies
Kagi (5/5): No training on user search data, no persistent user profiling, and no ad-based tracking by design.

#### Certifications

Glean leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

Glean (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified; HIPAA BAA available; GDPR compliant with DPA; no ISO 27001 publicly confirmed
Kagi (1/5): No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other formal third-party security certifications are currently published.

#### Regulatory Fit

Glean leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

Glean (4/5): Permission-enforcement architecture, HIPAA BAA, audit logs, and data residency options make Glean well-suited to large regulated enterprises; US jurisdiction is the primary limitation for EU-sovereignty-focused buyers
Kagi (2/5): Privacy-first business model is commendable, but lack of certifications and US jurisdiction limit regulated institutional use in Europe.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationGleanKagi
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo

Overall Verdict

Glean has a clear trust advantage, scoring 16/25 compared to Kagi's 11/25. Glean particularly excels in data residency, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Glean or Kagi?

Glean has a TrustKit score of 16/25 while Kagi scores 11/25. Glean currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Glean and Kagi compare on data residency?

Glean scores 3/5 for data residency (AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure), while Kagi scores 1/5 (All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently available.).

Are Glean and Kagi GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Glean has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Kagi scores 2/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool