Glean icon

Glean

Enterprise AI search that connects and searches all company knowledge with strict access controls

vs
Exa icon

Exa

AI-native search API that understands meaning, not just keywords

Glean
64%Moderate
16/25
Exa
40%Caution
10/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionGleanExa
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Glean: AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure
Exa: US-based infrastructure. No EU hosting option. Indexes public web content.
3/5
2/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Glean: US Delaware corporation subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act; DPAs available for GDPR; Capital One Ventures as investor may raise considerations for some financial services organisations
Exa: US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction. Early-stage company with standard US privacy practices.
2/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Glean: Customer data not used to train foundational AI models; strict permission mirroring ensures data is only surfaced to authorised users; comprehensive audit logs and configurable retention policies
Exa: Search queries logged for service improvement. No customer data used for training proprietary search models. API usage logs retained per standard practices.
4/5
3/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Glean: SOC 2 Type II certified; HIPAA BAA available; GDPR compliant with DPA; no ISO 27001 publicly confirmed
Exa: No security certifications publicly disclosed. Early-stage startup focused on product development.
3/5
1/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Glean: Permission-enforcement architecture, HIPAA BAA, audit logs, and data residency options make Glean well-suited to large regulated enterprises; US jurisdiction is the primary limitation for EU-sovereignty-focused buyers
Exa: Developer tool for search functionality. Regulatory fit depends on the application built on top. Not suitable for handling sensitive data directly.
4/5
2/5
Total Score
16/25
10/25

Best For

Glean iconGlean

Best for teams on a tight budget.

Exa iconExa

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

Exa vs Glean: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Exa (Exa, US) scores 10/25 overall with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. AI-native search API that understands meaning, not just keywords. Glean (Glean, US) scores 16/25 with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Enterprise AI search that connects and searches all company knowledge with strict access controls.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Glean leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Exa (2/5): US-based infrastructure. No EU hosting option. Indexes public web content.
Glean (3/5): AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 2/5.

Exa (2/5): US Delaware corporation. Subject to US jurisdiction. Early-stage company with standard US privacy practices.
Glean (2/5): US Delaware corporation subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act; DPAs available for GDPR; Capital One Ventures as investor may raise considerations for some financial services organisations

#### Data Retention & Training

Glean leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Exa (3/5): Search queries logged for service improvement. No customer data used for training proprietary search models. API usage logs retained per standard practices.
Glean (4/5): Customer data not used to train foundational AI models; strict permission mirroring ensures data is only surfaced to authorised users; comprehensive audit logs and configurable retention policies

#### Certifications

Glean leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

Exa (1/5): No security certifications publicly disclosed. Early-stage startup focused on product development.
Glean (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified; HIPAA BAA available; GDPR compliant with DPA; no ISO 27001 publicly confirmed

#### Regulatory Fit

Glean leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

Exa (2/5): Developer tool for search functionality. Regulatory fit depends on the application built on top. Not suitable for handling sensitive data directly.
Glean (4/5): Permission-enforcement architecture, HIPAA BAA, audit logs, and data residency options make Glean well-suited to large regulated enterprises; US jurisdiction is the primary limitation for EU-sovereignty-focused buyers

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationExaGlean
SOC 2 Type IINoYes

Overall Verdict

Glean has a clear trust advantage, scoring 16/25 compared to Exa's 10/25. Glean particularly excels in data residency, data retention & training, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Glean or Exa?

Glean has a TrustKit score of 16/25 while Exa scores 10/25. Glean currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Glean and Exa compare on data residency?

Glean scores 3/5 for data residency (AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure), while Exa scores 2/5 (US-based infrastructure. No EU hosting option. Indexes public web content.).

Are Glean and Exa GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Glean has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Exa scores 2/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool