Glean icon

Glean

Enterprise AI search that connects and searches all company knowledge with strict access controls

vs
Elicit icon

Elicit

AI research assistant for finding and analysing academic literature

Glean
64%Moderate
16/25
Elicit
32%Caution
8/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionGleanElicit
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Glean: AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure
Elicit: Data is processed on US infrastructure only with no EU data residency option currently available.
3/5
1/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Glean: US Delaware corporation subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act; DPAs available for GDPR; Capital One Ventures as investor may raise considerations for some financial services organisations
Elicit: US-incorporated under Delaware law and subject to CLOUD Act; limited EU-specific legal protections are in place.
2/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Glean: Customer data not used to train foundational AI models; strict permission mirroring ensures data is only surfaced to authorised users; comprehensive audit logs and configurable retention policies
Elicit: Data handling for uploaded documents and queries should be verified against current terms; opt-out is unclear.
4/5
2/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Glean: SOC 2 Type II certified; HIPAA BAA available; GDPR compliant with DPA; no ISO 27001 publicly confirmed
Elicit: No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other recognised security certifications are currently published.
3/5
1/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Glean: Permission-enforcement architecture, HIPAA BAA, audit logs, and data residency options make Glean well-suited to large regulated enterprises; US jurisdiction is the primary limitation for EU-sovereignty-focused buyers
Elicit: Suitable for individual researchers with low-risk data; institutional European deployments require significant additional assurances.
4/5
2/5
Total Score
16/25
8/25

Best For

Glean iconGlean

Best for teams on a tight budget.

Elicit iconElicit

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

Elicit vs Glean: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Elicit (Elicit, US) scores 8/25 overall with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. AI research assistant for finding and analysing academic literature. Glean (Glean, US) scores 16/25 with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Enterprise AI search that connects and searches all company knowledge with strict access controls.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Glean leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

Elicit (1/5): Data is processed on US infrastructure only with no EU data residency option currently available.
Glean (3/5): AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 2/5.

Elicit (2/5): US-incorporated under Delaware law and subject to CLOUD Act; limited EU-specific legal protections are in place.
Glean (2/5): US Delaware corporation subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act; DPAs available for GDPR; Capital One Ventures as investor may raise considerations for some financial services organisations

#### Data Retention & Training

Glean leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

Elicit (2/5): Data handling for uploaded documents and queries should be verified against current terms; opt-out is unclear.
Glean (4/5): Customer data not used to train foundational AI models; strict permission mirroring ensures data is only surfaced to authorised users; comprehensive audit logs and configurable retention policies

#### Certifications

Glean leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

Elicit (1/5): No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other recognised security certifications are currently published.
Glean (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified; HIPAA BAA available; GDPR compliant with DPA; no ISO 27001 publicly confirmed

#### Regulatory Fit

Glean leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

Elicit (2/5): Suitable for individual researchers with low-risk data; institutional European deployments require significant additional assurances.
Glean (4/5): Permission-enforcement architecture, HIPAA BAA, audit logs, and data residency options make Glean well-suited to large regulated enterprises; US jurisdiction is the primary limitation for EU-sovereignty-focused buyers

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationElicitGlean
SOC 2 Type IINoYes

Overall Verdict

Glean has a clear trust advantage, scoring 16/25 compared to Elicit's 8/25. Glean particularly excels in data residency, data retention & training, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Glean or Elicit?

Glean has a TrustKit score of 16/25 while Elicit scores 8/25. Glean currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Glean and Elicit compare on data residency?

Glean scores 3/5 for data residency (AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure), while Elicit scores 1/5 (Data is processed on US infrastructure only with no EU data residency option currently available.).

Are Glean and Elicit GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Glean has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Elicit scores 2/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool