Sourcegraph Cody icon

Sourcegraph Cody

AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls

vs
Cursor icon

Cursor

AI-first code editor built for pair programming with large language models

Sourcegraph Cody
72%Strong
18/25
Cursor
60%Moderate
15/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionSourcegraph CodyCursor
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Sourcegraph Cody: Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.
Cursor: Privacy Mode prevents code storage on servers; no geographic data residency selection
3/5
3/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Sourcegraph Cody: US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.
Cursor: US Delaware corporation subject to CLOUD Act; Privacy Mode mitigates some risks
3/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Sourcegraph Cody: Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.
Cursor: Privacy Mode guarantees no code stored in plaintext and no use for AI training
5/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Sourcegraph Cody: Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.
Cursor: SOC 2 Type II certified; enterprise plan includes security audit access
4/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Sourcegraph Cody: Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.
Cursor: Privacy Mode and SOC 2 make it suitable for most engineering teams; strict residency requirements need enterprise discussion
3/5
3/5
Total Score
18/25
15/25

Best For

Sourcegraph Cody iconSourcegraph Cody

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Cursor iconCursor

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Cursor (Anysphere, Inc., US) scores 15/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-first code editor built for pair programming with large language models. Sourcegraph Cody (Sourcegraph, US) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 3/5.

Cursor (3/5): Privacy Mode prevents code storage on servers; no geographic data residency selection
Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Cursor (2/5): US Delaware corporation subject to CLOUD Act; Privacy Mode mitigates some risks
Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): US incorporation, Delaware jurisdiction. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 available. Enterprise self-hosted with EU data centres removes US cloud dependency. Bring-your-own-LLM allows choice of EU-incorporated model provider.

#### Data Retention & Training

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Cursor (4/5): Privacy Mode guarantees no code stored in plaintext and no use for AI training
Sourcegraph Cody (5/5): Code and queries are not used for model training. Self-hosted deployment gives organisations full control over data retention. Enterprise DPA and audit logging available. Strong data governance posture.

#### Certifications

Sourcegraph Cody leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Cursor (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified; enterprise plan includes security audit access
Sourcegraph Cody (4/5): Holds both SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Strong certification posture for an enterprise developer tooling company. Appropriate for regulated-industry procurement.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 3/5.

Cursor (3/5): Privacy Mode and SOC 2 make it suitable for most engineering teams; strict residency requirements need enterprise discussion
Sourcegraph Cody (3/5): Self-hosted enterprise deployment with EU data centres and EU-region LLM provider is well-suited for EU regulated industries. Cloud product requires SCCs. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 meet common enterprise procurement thresholds.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationCursorSourcegraph Cody
ISO 27001NoYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes

Overall Verdict

Sourcegraph Cody has a clear trust advantage, scoring 18/25 compared to Cursor's 15/25. Sourcegraph Cody particularly excels in legal jurisdiction, data retention & training, certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor?

Sourcegraph Cody has a TrustKit score of 18/25 while Cursor scores 15/25. Sourcegraph Cody currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor compare on data residency?

Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5 for data residency (Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.), while Cursor scores 3/5 (Privacy Mode prevents code storage on servers; no geographic data residency selection).

Are Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Sourcegraph Cody has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Cursor scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool