Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls
Cursor
AI-first code editor built for pair programming with large language models
Score Breakdown
Best For
Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.
Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.
Detailed Comparison
Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody: Trust & Compliance Comparison
Cursor (Anysphere, Inc., US) scores 15/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-first code editor built for pair programming with large language models. Sourcegraph Cody (Sourcegraph, US) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls.
Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown
#### Data Residency
Both score equally at 3/5.
#### Legal Jurisdiction
Sourcegraph Cody leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.
#### Data Retention & Training
Sourcegraph Cody leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.
#### Certifications
Sourcegraph Cody leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.
#### Regulatory Fit
Both score equally at 3/5.
Certifications at a Glance
| Certification | Cursor | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | No | Yes |
| SOC 2 Type II | Yes | Yes |
Overall Verdict
Sourcegraph Cody has a clear trust advantage, scoring 18/25 compared to Cursor's 15/25. Sourcegraph Cody particularly excels in legal jurisdiction, data retention & training, certifications.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for EU compliance, Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor?
Sourcegraph Cody has a TrustKit score of 18/25 while Cursor scores 15/25. Sourcegraph Cody currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.
How do Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor compare on data residency?
Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5 for data residency (Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.), while Cursor scores 3/5 (Privacy Mode prevents code storage on servers; no geographic data residency selection).
Are Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor GDPR compliant?
Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Sourcegraph Cody has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Cursor scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.