Qodo icon

Qodo

AI code review and testing tool with agentic workflows for quality assurance

vs
Cursor icon

Cursor

AI-first code editor built for pair programming with large language models

Qodo
68%Strong
17/25
Cursor
60%Moderate
15/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionQodoCursor
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Qodo: Self-hosted and on-premise deployment options available. Cloud version on US infrastructure. Enterprise customers can keep code entirely on their own infrastructure.
Cursor: Privacy Mode prevents code storage on servers; no geographic data residency selection
4/5
3/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Qodo: Israeli company with adequate GDPR data transfer status. On-premise deployment mitigates jurisdiction concerns. Not subject to US CLOUD Act as primary entity.
Cursor: US Delaware corporation subject to CLOUD Act; Privacy Mode mitigates some risks
3/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Qodo: Code not used for training. Self-hosted option means code never leaves customer infrastructure. Clear data handling policies.
Cursor: Privacy Mode guarantees no code stored in plaintext and no use for AI training
4/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Qodo: SOC 2 Type II certified. GDPR compliant. Strong security posture for a development tool. No ISO 27001.
Cursor: SOC 2 Type II certified; enterprise plan includes security audit access
3/5
3/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Qodo: Self-hosted deployment suitable for regulated industries. SOC 2 certified. Good fit for financial services and enterprises with strict code security requirements.
Cursor: Privacy Mode and SOC 2 make it suitable for most engineering teams; strict residency requirements need enterprise discussion
3/5
3/5
Total Score
17/25
15/25

Best For

Qodo iconQodo

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.

Cursor iconCursor

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Cursor vs Qodo: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Cursor (Anysphere, Inc., US) scores 15/25 overall with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. AI-first code editor built for pair programming with large language models. Qodo (Qodo, IL) scores 17/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI code review and testing tool with agentic workflows for quality assurance.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Qodo leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Cursor (3/5): Privacy Mode prevents code storage on servers; no geographic data residency selection
Qodo (4/5): Self-hosted and on-premise deployment options available. Cloud version on US infrastructure. Enterprise customers can keep code entirely on their own infrastructure.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Qodo leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Cursor (2/5): US Delaware corporation subject to CLOUD Act; Privacy Mode mitigates some risks
Qodo (3/5): Israeli company with adequate GDPR data transfer status. On-premise deployment mitigates jurisdiction concerns. Not subject to US CLOUD Act as primary entity.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 4/5.

Cursor (4/5): Privacy Mode guarantees no code stored in plaintext and no use for AI training
Qodo (4/5): Code not used for training. Self-hosted option means code never leaves customer infrastructure. Clear data handling policies.

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 3/5.

Cursor (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified; enterprise plan includes security audit access
Qodo (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified. GDPR compliant. Strong security posture for a development tool. No ISO 27001.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 3/5.

Cursor (3/5): Privacy Mode and SOC 2 make it suitable for most engineering teams; strict residency requirements need enterprise discussion
Qodo (3/5): Self-hosted deployment suitable for regulated industries. SOC 2 certified. Good fit for financial services and enterprises with strict code security requirements.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationCursorQodo
GDPR DPANoYes
SOC 2 Type IIYesYes

Overall Verdict

Qodo has a clear trust advantage, scoring 17/25 compared to Cursor's 15/25. Qodo particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Qodo or Cursor?

Qodo has a TrustKit score of 17/25 while Cursor scores 15/25. Qodo currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Qodo and Cursor compare on data residency?

Qodo scores 4/5 for data residency (Self-hosted and on-premise deployment options available. Cloud version on US infrastructure. Enterprise customers can keep code entirely on their own infrastructure.), while Cursor scores 3/5 (Privacy Mode prevents code storage on servers; no geographic data residency selection).

Are Qodo and Cursor GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Qodo has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Cursor scores 3/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool