Corti icon

Corti

Danish AI clinical decision support for emergency medicine and patient triage

vs
Harvey AI icon

Harvey AI

AI assistant built for legal professionals

Corti
96%Excellent
24/25
Harvey AI
68%Strong
17/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionCortiHarvey AI
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Corti: Data processed exclusively in EU data centres (Denmark/Germany). Danish incorporation means EU law governs by default. No US cloud dependency. Maximum data residency for healthcare AI.
Harvey AI: US/EU hosting via Azure
5/5
3/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Corti: Danish ApS incorporated under Danish and EU law. GDPR and EU AI Act apply as corporate law. Datatilsynet (Danish DPA) is the lead supervisory authority. No CLOUD Act exposure. Strongest possible EU jurisdiction profile.
Harvey AI: US Delaware corporation
5/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Corti: Patient conversation and clinical data not used for cross-customer model training without explicit consent. Configurable retention aligned with healthcare regulatory requirements. GDPR-compliant DPA as healthcare data processor.
Harvey AI: No training on client data; strict data isolation
5/5
4/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Corti: Holds ISO 27001 (information security) and ISO 13485 (medical devices quality management), demonstrating compliance with EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) requirements. Strong certification posture for a clinical AI company.
Harvey AI: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001
4/5
4/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Corti: Excellent fit for EU healthcare organisations including NHS, Nordic public health systems, and German/French hospital groups. MDR compliance, GDPR-native design, and EU jurisdiction make this one of the highest-scoring healthcare AI tools for European regulated use.
Harvey AI: SRA-suitable; used by Magic Circle and elite law firms
5/5
4/5
Total Score
24/25
17/25

Best For

Corti iconCorti

Best for EU-headquartered organisations needing maximum data sovereignty; regulated industries (CNIL, BaFin); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Harvey AI iconHarvey AI

Best for regulated industries (SRA); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls.

Detailed Comparison

Corti vs Harvey AI: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Corti (Corti, DK) scores 24/25 overall with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. Danish AI clinical decision support for emergency medicine and patient triage. Harvey AI (Harvey AI, Inc., US) scores 17/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI assistant built for legal professionals.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Corti leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.

Corti (5/5): Data processed exclusively in EU data centres (Denmark/Germany). Danish incorporation means EU law governs by default. No US cloud dependency. Maximum data residency for healthcare AI.
Harvey AI (3/5): US/EU hosting via Azure

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Corti leads with 5/5 vs 2/5.

Corti (5/5): Danish ApS incorporated under Danish and EU law. GDPR and EU AI Act apply as corporate law. Datatilsynet (Danish DPA) is the lead supervisory authority. No CLOUD Act exposure. Strongest possible EU jurisdiction profile.
Harvey AI (2/5): US Delaware corporation

#### Data Retention & Training

Corti leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Corti (5/5): Patient conversation and clinical data not used for cross-customer model training without explicit consent. Configurable retention aligned with healthcare regulatory requirements. GDPR-compliant DPA as healthcare data processor.
Harvey AI (4/5): No training on client data; strict data isolation

#### Certifications

Both score equally at 4/5.

Corti (4/5): Holds ISO 27001 (information security) and ISO 13485 (medical devices quality management), demonstrating compliance with EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) requirements. Strong certification posture for a clinical AI company.
Harvey AI (4/5): SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001

#### Regulatory Fit

Corti leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Corti (5/5): Excellent fit for EU healthcare organisations including NHS, Nordic public health systems, and German/French hospital groups. MDR compliance, GDPR-native design, and EU jurisdiction make this one of the highest-scoring healthcare AI tools for European regulated use.
Harvey AI (4/5): SRA-suitable; used by Magic Circle and elite law firms

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationCortiHarvey AI
ISO 13485YesNo
ISO 27001YesYes
SOC 2 Type IINoYes

Overall Verdict

Corti has a clear trust advantage, scoring 24/25 compared to Harvey AI's 17/25. Corti particularly excels in data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention & training, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Corti or Harvey AI?

Corti has a TrustKit score of 24/25 while Harvey AI scores 17/25. Corti currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Corti and Harvey AI compare on data residency?

Corti scores 5/5 for data residency (Data processed exclusively in EU data centres (Denmark/Germany). Danish incorporation means EU law governs by default. No US cloud dependency. Maximum data residency for healthcare AI.), while Harvey AI scores 3/5 (US/EU hosting via Azure).

Are Corti and Harvey AI GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Corti has a regulatory fit score of 5/5 and Harvey AI scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool