Glean icon

Glean

Enterprise AI search that connects and searches all company knowledge with strict access controls

vs
Consensus icon

Consensus

AI-powered search engine for evidence-based scientific research

Glean
64%Moderate
16/25
Consensus
36%Caution
9/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionGleanConsensus
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Glean: AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure
Consensus: All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently offered.
3/5
1/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Glean: US Delaware corporation subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act; DPAs available for GDPR; Capital One Ventures as investor may raise considerations for some financial services organisations
Consensus: US-incorporated and subject to CLOUD Act; no publicised EU-specific legal frameworks or SCCs are in place.
2/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Glean: Customer data not used to train foundational AI models; strict permission mirroring ensures data is only surfaced to authorised users; comprehensive audit logs and configurable retention policies
Consensus: States it does not sell user data and does not train on user queries; full retention policy details are limited.
4/5
3/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Glean: SOC 2 Type II certified; HIPAA BAA available; GDPR compliant with DPA; no ISO 27001 publicly confirmed
Consensus: No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other formal third-party security certifications are currently published.
3/5
1/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Glean: Permission-enforcement architecture, HIPAA BAA, audit logs, and data residency options make Glean well-suited to large regulated enterprises; US jurisdiction is the primary limitation for EU-sovereignty-focused buyers
Consensus: Acceptable for low-risk research activities; European institutional procurement will require additional assurances not currently available.
4/5
2/5
Total Score
16/25
9/25

Best For

Glean iconGlean

Best for teams on a tight budget.

Consensus iconConsensus

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Detailed Comparison

Consensus vs Glean: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Consensus (Consensus, US) scores 9/25 overall with a Review Required (Caution) trust badge. AI-powered search engine for evidence-based scientific research. Glean (Glean, US) scores 16/25 with a Bronze (Moderate) trust badge. Enterprise AI search that connects and searches all company knowledge with strict access controls.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Glean leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

Consensus (1/5): All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently offered.
Glean (3/5): AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Both score equally at 2/5.

Consensus (2/5): US-incorporated and subject to CLOUD Act; no publicised EU-specific legal frameworks or SCCs are in place.
Glean (2/5): US Delaware corporation subject to US jurisdiction and CLOUD Act; DPAs available for GDPR; Capital One Ventures as investor may raise considerations for some financial services organisations

#### Data Retention & Training

Glean leads with 4/5 vs 3/5.

Consensus (3/5): States it does not sell user data and does not train on user queries; full retention policy details are limited.
Glean (4/5): Customer data not used to train foundational AI models; strict permission mirroring ensures data is only surfaced to authorised users; comprehensive audit logs and configurable retention policies

#### Certifications

Glean leads with 3/5 vs 1/5.

Consensus (1/5): No SOC 2, ISO 27001, or other formal third-party security certifications are currently published.
Glean (3/5): SOC 2 Type II certified; HIPAA BAA available; GDPR compliant with DPA; no ISO 27001 publicly confirmed

#### Regulatory Fit

Glean leads with 4/5 vs 2/5.

Consensus (2/5): Acceptable for low-risk research activities; European institutional procurement will require additional assurances not currently available.
Glean (4/5): Permission-enforcement architecture, HIPAA BAA, audit logs, and data residency options make Glean well-suited to large regulated enterprises; US jurisdiction is the primary limitation for EU-sovereignty-focused buyers

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationConsensusGlean
SOC 2 Type IINoYes

Overall Verdict

Glean has a clear trust advantage, scoring 16/25 compared to Consensus's 9/25. Glean particularly excels in data residency, data retention & training, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Glean or Consensus?

Glean has a TrustKit score of 16/25 while Consensus scores 9/25. Glean currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Glean and Consensus compare on data residency?

Glean scores 3/5 for data residency (AWS-hosted with US and EU options; data residency configurations available for regulated industries on request; permission-enforcement architecture prevents cross-tenant data exposure), while Consensus scores 1/5 (All data is processed on US infrastructure with no EU data residency option currently offered.).

Are Glean and Consensus GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Glean has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Consensus scores 2/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool