Claude icon

Claude

Anthropic's safety-focused AI assistant for analysis, writing, and coding

vs
Continue icon

Continue

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM

Claude
80%Strong
20/25
Continue
68%Strong
17/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionClaudeContinue
Data Residency
Where is your data stored and processed?
Claude: Regional processing available via AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex AI, and Azure in EU, UK, US, and more
Continue: Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.
4/5
5/5
Legal Jurisdiction
Which laws govern the company and your data?
Claude: US Delaware PBC subject to CLOUD Act; SCCs and DPAs available for EU transfers
Continue: Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.
3/5
2/5
Data Retention & Training
Is your data used for model training?
Claude: Commercial customer data never used for model training by default
Continue: Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.
5/5
5/5
Certifications
ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.
Claude: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, and HIPAA certified
Continue: No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.
4/5
1/5
Regulatory Fit
Suitability for regulated industries and professional services
Claude: Suitable for regulated industries including healthcare (HIPAA BAA) and financial services
Continue: Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.
4/5
4/5
Total Score
20/25
17/25

Best For

Claude iconClaude

Best for organisations requiring broad certification coverage (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001); regulated industries (ICO, HHS); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Continue iconContinue

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Claude vs Continue: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Claude (Anthropic, US) scores 20/25 overall with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Anthropic's safety-focused AI assistant for analysis, writing, and coding. Continue (Continue, US) scores 17/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Continue leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

Claude (4/5): Regional processing available via AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex AI, and Azure in EU, UK, US, and more
Continue (5/5): Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Claude leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

Claude (3/5): US Delaware PBC subject to CLOUD Act; SCCs and DPAs available for EU transfers
Continue (2/5): Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.

#### Data Retention & Training

Both score equally at 5/5.

Claude (5/5): Commercial customer data never used for model training by default
Continue (5/5): Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.

#### Certifications

Claude leads with 4/5 vs 1/5.

Claude (4/5): SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, and HIPAA certified
Continue (1/5): No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.

#### Regulatory Fit

Both score equally at 4/5.

Claude (4/5): Suitable for regulated industries including healthcare (HIPAA BAA) and financial services
Continue (4/5): Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.

Certifications at a Glance

CertificationClaudeContinue
HIPAAYesNo
ISO 27001YesNo
ISO 42001YesNo
SOC 2 Type IIYesNo

Overall Verdict

Claude has a clear trust advantage, scoring 20/25 compared to Continue's 17/25. Claude particularly excels in legal jurisdiction, certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Claude or Continue?

Claude has a TrustKit score of 20/25 while Continue scores 17/25. Claude currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Claude and Continue compare on data residency?

Claude scores 4/5 for data residency (Regional processing available via AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex AI, and Azure in EU, UK, US, and more), while Continue scores 5/5 (Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.).

Are Claude and Continue GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Claude has a regulatory fit score of 4/5 and Continue scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool