Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls
Amazon Q Developer
AWS-native AI assistant for software development and cloud operations
Score Breakdown
Best For
Best for organisations requiring broad certification coverage (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI DSS); regulated industries (FedRAMP); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget.
Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.
Detailed Comparison
Amazon Q Developer vs Sourcegraph Cody: Trust & Compliance Comparison
Amazon Q Developer (Amazon Web Services, US) scores 22/25 overall with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. AWS-native AI assistant for software development and cloud operations. Sourcegraph Cody (Sourcegraph, US) scores 18/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. AI coding assistant with deep codebase search and enterprise security controls.
Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown
#### Data Residency
Amazon Q Developer leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.
#### Legal Jurisdiction
Both score equally at 3/5.
#### Data Retention & Training
Sourcegraph Cody leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.
#### Certifications
Amazon Q Developer leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.
#### Regulatory Fit
Amazon Q Developer leads with 5/5 vs 3/5.
Certifications at a Glance
| Certification | Amazon Q Developer | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| FedRAMP | Yes | No |
| HIPAA | Yes | No |
| ISO 27001 | Yes | Yes |
| PCI DSS | Yes | No |
| SOC 2 Type II | Yes | Yes |
Overall Verdict
Amazon Q Developer has a clear trust advantage, scoring 22/25 compared to Sourcegraph Cody's 18/25. Amazon Q Developer particularly excels in data residency, certifications, regulatory fit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for EU compliance, Sourcegraph Cody or Amazon Q Developer?
Sourcegraph Cody has a TrustKit score of 18/25 while Amazon Q Developer scores 22/25. Amazon Q Developer currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.
How do Sourcegraph Cody and Amazon Q Developer compare on data residency?
Sourcegraph Cody scores 3/5 for data residency (Cloud product uses US infrastructure. Self-hosted enterprise deployment allows organisations to choose their own data centre region, including EU. Score reflects the enterprise self-hosted path which achieves 5; cloud product scores 1.), while Amazon Q Developer scores 5/5 (Hosted on AWS global infrastructure with data residency options across all major AWS regions worldwide.).
Are Sourcegraph Cody and Amazon Q Developer GDPR compliant?
Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Sourcegraph Cody has a regulatory fit score of 3/5 and Amazon Q Developer scores 5/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.