Amazon Q Developer

AWS-native AI assistant for software development and cloud operations

Continue

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM

Amazon Q Developer

Excellent

22/25

Continue

Strong

17/25

Score Breakdown

DimensionAmazon Q DeveloperContinue

Data Residency

Where is your data stored and processed?

Amazon Q Developer: Hosted on AWS global infrastructure with data residency options across all major AWS regions worldwide.

Continue: Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.

5/5

Hosted on AWS global infrastructure with data residency options across all major AWS regions worldwide.

5/5

Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.

Legal Jurisdiction

Which laws govern the company and your data?

Amazon Q Developer: US company subject to US legal jurisdiction; however, AWS's extensive global compliance infrastructure mitigates many risks.

Continue: Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.

3/5

US company subject to US legal jurisdiction; however, AWS's extensive global compliance infrastructure mitigates many risks.

2/5

Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.

Data Retention & Training

Is your data used for model training?

Amazon Q Developer: Code suggestions are not used to train models; strong data isolation at the enterprise level.

Continue: Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.

4/5

Code suggestions are not used to train models; strong data isolation at the enterprise level.

5/5

Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.

Certifications

ISO 27001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials, etc.

Amazon Q Developer: Inherits AWS's extensive certification portfolio including SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and FedRAMP.

Continue: No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.

5/5

Inherits AWS's extensive certification portfolio including SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and FedRAMP.

1/5

No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.

Regulatory Fit

Suitability for regulated industries and professional services

Amazon Q Developer: Excellent fit for regulated industries; FedRAMP authorized and suitable for US government workloads.

Continue: Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.

5/5

Excellent fit for regulated industries; FedRAMP authorized and suitable for US government workloads.

4/5

Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.

Total Score

22/25

17/25

Best For

Amazon Q Developer

Best for organisations requiring broad certification coverage (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI DSS); regulated industries (FedRAMP); privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; teams on a tight budget; enterprises requiring SSO integration.

Continue

Best for privacy-conscious teams who need strong data retention controls; organisations that need self-hosted or on-premise deployment; teams on a tight budget.

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Q Developer vs Continue: Trust & Compliance Comparison

Amazon Q Developer (Amazon Web Services, US) scores 22/25 overall with a Gold (Excellent) trust badge. AWS-native AI assistant for software development and cloud operations. Continue (Continue, US) scores 17/25 with a Silver (Strong) trust badge. Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains that works with any LLM.

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

#### Data Residency

Both score equally at 5/5.

●Amazon Q Developer (5/5): Hosted on AWS global infrastructure with data residency options across all major AWS regions worldwide.

●Continue (5/5): Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.

#### Legal Jurisdiction

Amazon Q Developer leads with 3/5 vs 2/5.

●Amazon Q Developer (3/5): US company subject to US legal jurisdiction; however, AWS's extensive global compliance infrastructure mitigates many risks.

●Continue (2/5): Delaware incorporation. However, the open-source licence and self-hosting capability mean the product can be used with zero dependency on the company's cloud infrastructure.

#### Data Retention & Training

Continue leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●Amazon Q Developer (4/5): Code suggestions are not used to train models; strong data isolation at the enterprise level.

●Continue (5/5): Open-source, self-hosted, no telemetry when configured for local use. Complete data lifecycle control. Code is auditable.

#### Certifications

Amazon Q Developer leads with 5/5 vs 1/5.

●Amazon Q Developer (5/5): Inherits AWS's extensive certification portfolio including SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and FedRAMP.

●Continue (1/5): No formal certifications. Early-stage open-source project. Self-hosted model means organisations apply their own security controls.

#### Regulatory Fit

Amazon Q Developer leads with 5/5 vs 4/5.

●Amazon Q Developer (5/5): Excellent fit for regulated industries; FedRAMP authorized and suitable for US government workloads.

●Continue (4/5): Self-hosted with local models is the gold standard for code sovereignty. Used by defence, government, and financial services teams. Lack of certifications offset by self-hosting and open-source auditability.

Certifications at a Glance

Certification	Amazon Q Developer	Continue
FedRAMP	Yes	No
HIPAA	Yes	No
ISO 27001	Yes	No
PCI DSS	Yes	No
SOC 2 Type II	Yes	No

Overall Verdict

Amazon Q Developer has a clear trust advantage, scoring 22/25 compared to Continue's 17/25. Amazon Q Developer particularly excels in legal jurisdiction, certifications, regulatory fit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for EU compliance, Amazon Q Developer or Continue?

Amazon Q Developer has a TrustKit score of 22/25 while Continue scores 17/25. Amazon Q Developer currently rates higher across data residency, legal jurisdiction, data retention, certifications, and regulatory fit.

How do Amazon Q Developer and Continue compare on data residency?

Amazon Q Developer scores 5/5 for data residency (Hosted on AWS global infrastructure with data residency options across all major AWS regions worldwide.), while Continue scores 5/5 (Fully self-hosted with local model inference. Source code never leaves the developer's machine when using local models. Maximum data sovereignty achievable.).

Are Amazon Q Developer and Continue GDPR compliant?

Both tools are assessed across five compliance dimensions. Amazon Q Developer has a regulatory fit score of 5/5 and Continue scores 4/5. Check the full comparison above for a detailed breakdown.

Explore Each Tool